City of Wahoo v. Dickinson
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court of Saunders county. Heard below before Post, J. cited cases referred to in opinion. Burlington v. Leebriek, 43 Iowa, 252. Borough of JBittle Meadoios, 35 Penn. State, 335. Blanchard v. Bissell, 11 Ohio State, 96.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
In October, 1886, the proper authorities of the city of Wahoo passed a resolution that, “We favor and demand as a matter of right the annexation of the territory contiguous to the city of Wahoo,” etc., and described the territory sought to be annexed. The city thereupon filed a petition in the district court of Saunders county, setting forth the facts required by the statute, and attached an accurate map of the territory sought to be annexed to the said petition, and prayed fora decree of the court annexing the territory set forth in the petition to the city of Wahoo. There were nearly one…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Galesburg v. HawkinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Kayser v. Trustees of BremenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
- The People v. . CarpenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- City of Burlington v. LeebrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Turner v. AlthausNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by35 opinions
- In Re County Com'rs of Counties Comprising Seventh Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- State ex rel. White v. BarkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- In re Incorporation of Village of North MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Searle v. YensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
- Nickel v. School Board of AxtellNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.