Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hammond v. Dimond

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1895No. 7500PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Strode, J.

1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.

This was a proceeding in the nature of a writ of quo warranto in the district court for Lancaster county. The ob-. ject of the proceeding was to test the legality of the alleged incorporation of the city, formerly the village, of College Yiew, in said county. A general demurrer to the petition was sustained, and final judgment having been entered thereon, the cause was removed into this court for review upon the petition in error of the relator. The only question presented being the sufficiency of the petition to entitle the relator to relief, it is deemed proper to here copy it at length,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Minnetonka VillageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. State ex rel. Patterson v. McReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  3. McClay v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  4. South Platte Land Co. v. Buffalo CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Searle v. YensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. City of SarasotaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  3. Nickel v. School Board of AxtellNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State ex rel. Fullerton v. Des Moines City RailwaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. State ex rel. Town of Holland v. LammersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API