Legal Opinion

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Clements

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 14, 1955No. 35462PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.

In this opinion the plaintiff in error is referred to as the defendant or railroad company and the defendant in error as the plaintiff.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds, and eight special grounds.

The fourth ground of the motion for a new trial asserts that the court erred in charging the jury: “With respect to the requirements that all motor vehicles must be equipped with lights capable of revealing an object five hundred feet ahead, I charge you the following: It is common knowledge that substantial objects, because of their composition or coloring, and the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. FergusonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Tarbutton v. DugganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  4. Doby v. W. L. Florence Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  5. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. JarrettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Hoard v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CoxwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  3. Bill Spreen Toyota, Inc. v. JenquinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Hogan v. OliveraCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Carroll v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API