Clary v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for cruelty to animal; from Wayne superior court— Judge Conyers. April 19, 1910.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
1. The court did not err in overruling the objection to the juror who was challenged on account of relationship. If the juror’s great-grandmother and the great-grandfather of the father of the accused were brother and sister, the relationship was not within the 9th degree. See 2 Bl. Com. 207; Smith v. State, 2 Ga. App. 576 (59 S. E. 311) ; Ledford v. State, 75 Ga. 857.
2. It is not error to allow even a non-expert witness to give his opinion, where he has fully stated’ the facts upon which the opinion is based. The probative value of the opinion is for the jury. Whether a particular witness…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
3Cited by17 opinions
- Whatley v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Rouse v. FussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Carroll v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Randall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- American Fire & Casualty Company v. GrizzleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.