Legal Opinion

Porto v. Sullivan

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 16, 2010No. AC 30631PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, J.

The plaintiff, Jesse Porto, appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing his appeal from the decree of the Probate Court for the district of Waterbury approving the final accounting of the estate of John Porto. Specifically, the plaintiff claims that the Superior Court improperly (1) determined that his appeal was untimely pursuant to General Statutes § 45a-187 (a) and (2) denied his motion for reargument. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.

The record reveals the following factual and procedural history. The plaintiff is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. GogginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Kron v. ThelenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Heiser v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  4. St. George v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Satti v. RagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chartier v. ValliereConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  2. Chartier v. ValliereConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  3. Mierzejewski v. BrownellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API