Legal Opinion

Shah Bros., Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 18, 2014No. Slip Op. 14-109; Court 10-00205PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

POGUE, Senior Judge:

Plaintiff Shah Bros., Inc. (“Shah Bros.”) — an importer of a smokeless tobacco product from India called “gutkha”— seeks an award of its attorney’s fees, expenses, and costs in connection with this action, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (2012) (“EAJA”). 1 As explained below, because Shah Bros, was the prevailing party;, because the agency determination upon which this action is based was not substantially justified; and because no special circumstances exist in this case that would make an EAJA fees and costs award unjust,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Alvarez v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Custom Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
  2. Shah Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API