Legal Opinion

Shah Bros., Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 15, 2014No. Slip Op. 14-143; Court 10-00205Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

POGUE, Senior Judge:

In this action, Plaintiff Shah Bros., Inc.. (“Shah Bros.”) — the prevailing party 1 — ■ was previously awarded, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (2012) (“EAJA”), compensation for attorneys’ fees and expenses that it had reasonably incurred. 2 Shah Bros, now seeks a supplemental award of the additional attorneys’ fees it incurred while litigating its EAJA application (the “fee litigation”). 3 Because Plaintiff is entitled to recover attorney fees for work reasonably expended to obtain the amount previously awarded, Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API