Shah Bros., Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
POGUE, Senior Judge:
In this action, Plaintiff Shah Bros., Inc.. (“Shah Bros.”) — the prevailing party 1 — ■ was previously awarded, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (2012) (“EAJA”), compensation for attorneys’ fees and expenses that it had reasonably incurred. 2 Shah Bros, now seeks a supplemental award of the additional attorneys’ fees it incurred while litigating its EAJA application (the “fee litigation”). 3 Because Plaintiff is entitled to recover attorney fees for work reasonably expended to obtain the amount previously awarded, Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.