Legal Opinion

Alvarez v. Smith

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 8, 2009No. 08-351PublishedCited by 334 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer

We granted certiorari in this case to determine whether Illinois law provides a sufficiently speedy opportunity for an individual, whose car or cash police have seized without a warrant, to contest the lawfulness of the seizure. See U. S. Const., Arndt. 14, § 1; United States v. Von Neumann, 474 U. S. 242 (1986); United States v. $8,850, 461 U. S. 555 (1983). At the time of oral argument, however, we learned that the underlying property disputes have all ended. The State has returned all the cars that it seized, and the individual property owners have either forfeited any relevant cash or…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by334 opinions

  1. Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Camreta v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Turner v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Wolfson v. BrammerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

329 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API