Legal Opinion
Crawford v. Lungren
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 11, 1996No. 95-56570PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge FERNANDEZ; Concurrence by Judge TASHIMA.
FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge:
Publishers, vendors, and one consumer of adult-oriented publications appeal the district court’s order holding constitutional a California statute that bans the sale of “harmful matter” in unsupervised sidewalk vending machines. They contend that the statute is facially invalid because it discriminates against the sale of certain publications on the basis of content without being narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling state interest. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
On January 1, 1995, California banned the sale of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Foti v. City of Menlo ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Mabe v. San Bernardino CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Sheriff DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Clarence Ray Allen v. Steven W. Ornoski, Warden, of the California State Prison at San Quentin Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.