Legal Opinion
Clarence Ray Allen v. Steven W. Ornoski, Warden, of the California State Prison at San Quentin Attorney General of the State of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 15, 2006No. 06-99001, 06-70206PublishedCited by 190 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge.
Clarence Ray Allen appeals from the district court’s order denying and dismissing in part his second petition for writ of habeas corpus and denying his requests for a stay of execution and for the issuance of a certificate of appealability on his Eighth Amendment claim based upon age and physical infirmity. He seeks a certificate of appealability and consideration on the merits of his age and physical infirmity claim, which, he argues, encompasses his Lackey claim, based on his long tenure on death row under “horrific conditions.” See Lackey v. Texas, 514 U.S. 1045, 115…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by190 opinions
- Zina Butler v. Housing Auth. County of LaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Moor v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- One Industries, LLC v. Jim O'Neal Distributing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.