Legal Opinion

Muller v. Robinson

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 19, 1961No. Civ. 19756PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOYT, J. pro tem. *

Appellant appeals from an order denying his motion made on January 5, 1960, to intervene in Lelah Muller v. Otis Robinson et al. This action was filed on March 5, 1958, and is to quiet title to a piece of real property. This is appellant’s second attempt to intervene in this ease. Section 1008 of the Code of Civil Procedure permits a subsequent application for the same order upon an alleged different statement of facts.

In his notice of motion for leave to intervene appellant incorporated exhibits as follows: “A”—agreement between appellant and Edward Danner, Jr., relating…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. County of San Bernardino v. Harsh California Corp.California Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Allen v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Public Utilities Commission v. RyersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Sutter Health Uninsured Pricing CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Olson v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API