Moses v. Chapman
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLett, J.
(after stating the facts as above).
The first proposition of the appellant, based on proper assignments of errer pertains to the proof of title to the land, offered and relied upon by the plaintiff in the case, Joseph A. Chapman. The power of attorney from Samuel Dyer to H. H. Haynie to sell and dispose of the land certificate issued to George Dyer, of date October 7, 1858, recites that he (Samuel Dyer) is “the father and sole heir at law of George Dyer, deceased,” and also the conveyance of the land certificate to Chester A. Bulkley by Samuel Dyer -by his attorney in fact, H. H. Haynie, of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fulkerson v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Maxson v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Baum v. McAfeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Ardoin v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Fielder v. PembertonTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bruni v. VidaurriTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- E. B. Germany v. J. B. TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Griffin v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Skipper v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Slattery v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.