Legal Opinion

Ardoin v. Cobb

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 22, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, El Paso County; A. M. Walthall, Judge. Action by Zach Lamar Cobb against Theo W. Ardoin and another. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtFly, J.

This is an action of trespass to try title instituted by Z. L. Cobb against Theo W. Ardoin and Eli Ardoin, to recover a tract of land known as survey 51 in section No. 1 in El Paso county. A trial by the court resulted in a judgment in favor of Cobb.

Plaintiff, Cobb, showed that the land was patented to W. O. Stanley on December 22, 1856, and that Stanley sold the land to Thomas B. Huling, and then, over the objection of defendants, he introduced in evidence a deed from Elizabeth Huling, described in the deed as “surviving widow of Thos. B. Huling, dec’d, late of Lampasas,” and in which, deed…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Deery v. CraySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Veramendi v. HutchinsTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Fulkerson v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Heirs of Shelby Corzine v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Chamblee v. TarboxTexas Supreme Court · 1863

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Zobel v. SlimTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Crosby v. ArdoinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Moses v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Slattery v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. W. T. Carter Bro. v. BendyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API