Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1939No. 7249PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding. Judge Harvey

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

This suit, in so far as this appeal is concerned, is an action of trespass to try title instituted by the plaintiffs in error, K. W. Griffin, F. E. Lumpkin, individually, and John Protho, as guardian of the estate of Maurice Protho, a minor, against the Stanolind Oil and Gas Company, to recover an undivided interest in the oil and gas leasehold estate held by the Company in a certain tract of twenty and a fraction acres in Gregg County. The said tract of twenty and a fraction acres is a part of a 54-acre…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Waggoner Estate v. Sigler Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. GammonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Klein v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Martin v. DialTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. First National Bank in Dallas v. KinabrewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Davis v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Knight v. Tannehill Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Buckner Orphans Home v. MabenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Williams v. Sohio Petroleum Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API