Legal Opinion

Fielder v. Pemberton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

PROM SCOTT. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Scott County. —Hugh Gr. Kyle, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the Court

Mb. Evans, Special Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was an ejectment hill filed in the chancery court of Scott county to recover about five hundred acres of land. The land in controversy is covered by two grants issued to Thomas B. Eastland, to wit, grant No. 21865, dated June 29, 1838, issued on Morgan county entry 1927 and grant No. 21840, dated June 28, 1838, issued on Morgan county entry 1931. The dividing line between these two grants runs through the land in dispute. The same land is also covered by grant No. 22342, dated December 31, 1838, issued to Julian P. Scott, on…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Carver v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Deery v. CraySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Crane v. Lessee of MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  4. Applegate v. Lexington & Carter County Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Fulkerson v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moses v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. City of Knoxville v. KaiserTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Neustadt v. Coline Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Hill v. HillCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
  5. Scott v. MangrumCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API