Legal Opinion
Aliotta v. Gruenberg
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 25, 2006No. Civil No. 05-2325 (RMU)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Plaintiffs’ Motion For Class Certification
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiffs are 49 current and former employees of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) who are all over 50 years young. The plaintiffs claim that the FDIC’s campaign to trim its workforce through a buyout program and a Reduction-in-Force program (“RIF”) violated the plaintiffs’ rights under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. The plaintiffs are now asking the court to certify their case as a class action. Because the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Aliotta v. BairCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Dupler v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Jermyn v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Harris v. KoenigDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Aliotta v. BairDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.