Legal Opinion

Jermyn v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 19, 2009No. 08 Civ. 214(CM)PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

McMAHON, District Judge.

Introduction

Plaintiff Thomas Jermyn (“Jermyn”) brings this lawsuit in his own right, and on behalf of thousands of similarly situated New York consumers, against defendant Best Buy Stores, L.P. (“Best Buy” or “company”). The plaintiff alleges five causes of action: (1) common law false advertising; (2) false and deceptive practice under Minnesota’s Consumer Fraud Act; (3) false and deceptive acts and practices under New York General Business Law § 349; (4) false and deceptive acts and practices under…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. Briarpatch Limited, L.P., Gerard F. Rubin v. Phoenix Pictures, Inc., Michael Medavoy, Geisler Roberdeau, Inc., Terence MalickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  5. In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Cabana Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  2. Charron v. Pinnacle Group N.Y. LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  4. Stinson v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  5. Tait v. BSH Home Appliances Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2012

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API