Legal Opinion
Aliotta v. Bair
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 18, 2008No. Civil Action 05-02325 (RMU)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Dependant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case comes before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability. The plaintiffs, former and current employees of the Division of Resolutions and Receiverships of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC” or “the defendant” or “the Agency”), bring a class action suit under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Aliotta v. BairCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Douglas-Slade v. LaHoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Davis v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Hopkins v. WhippleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Davis v. District of Columbia Child and Family Services Agency,et AlDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.