Legal Opinion

State v. Major

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1986No. 15850PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

Defendant-Appellant Melvina Hazel Major, an enrolled member of the Nez Perce Tribe of Indians, was convicted of grand theft by possessing stolen property in violation of I.C. §§ 18-2403(4) and 18-2407(l)(b)l. The items allegedly stolen were recovered from a location within the Nez Perce Indian Reservation, and from a pawn shop in Lewiston, outside the reservation. The item recovered from the pawn shop was located after Major had been charged and after the district court had denied Major’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

The Nez Perce Tribe previously had enacted a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. BushIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. MathewsIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. MichaelIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. McCormackIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Horsey v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API