Legal Opinion
Endress + Hauser, Inc. v. Hawk Measurement Systems Pty. Ltd.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided August 4, 1995No. IP 92-440-CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY REGARDING PATENT DAMAGES ISSUES
BARKER, Chief Judge.
This entry addresses the remaining damages issues tried on April 6, 1995, as the second part of the bifurcated trial. In the first part of the bifurcated trial, this Court found that Defendants Hawk Measurement Systems Pty. Limited, Inc., and Hawk Amer-ica, Inc. (“Defendants” or “Hawk”) literally infringed Plaintiffs Endress + Hauser, Inc.’s and Endress + Hauser GmbH’s (collectively “E + H” or “Plaintiffs”) patent. See Endress + Hauser, Inc. v. Hawk Measurement Systems Pty., No. IP 92-440-C, 1994 WL 736442, 32 U.S.P.Q.2d 1768 (S.D.Ind.…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Electro Medical Systems, S.A. v. Cooper Life Sciences, Inc., Dentsply International Inc., and Dentsply Research & Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bruce v. Weekly World News, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Straus v. DVC Worldwide, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- Linkco, Inc. v. Fujitsu Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Century Wrecker Corp. v. E.R. Buske Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
- Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. Sprint Communications Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.