Legal Opinion

Doe v. Markham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 2000No. 1980021PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff John Doe1 appeals from the trial court's August 19, 1998, order requiring remittitur of a punitive-damages award to $10,000. We reverse and remand.

John Doe is a physician whose medical practice is limited to a particular specialty. Beginning about April 1995, Earby S. Markham began writing false statements about Doe on the restroom walls of two state parks and a hotel located in Baldwin County. Doe learned about the statements from a local police chief, who initially accused Doe of making the statements. The statements read, "Will pay for gay sex" and "Will pay for gay sex with…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Insurance Mgt. & Admin. v. Palomar Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Wonder v. Southbound Records, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Edgar v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ChambleeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Hales v. ProEquities, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Overy v. MurphyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  4. Dean v. Director, Department of Industrial RelationsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  5. Chamblee v. Pinkerton Security & Investigations Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API