Legal Opinion

Hales v. ProEquities, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 11, 2003No. 1011015PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellants-plaintiffs Frank J. Hales and Iva Jean P. Hales appeal the order entered by the trial court compelling them to arbitrate their claims against appellee-defendant ProEquities, Inc., an investment company. We reverse and remand.

In July 1994, Wayne Gregory, an agent of ProEquities, convinced the Haleses to put their life savings of $430,000 in an investment account with ProEquities. On July 20, 1994, Frank Hales, alone, signed a "New Account Application," an individual retirement account ("IRA") application, and an IRA beneficiary designation form. The contractual documents include a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Morewitz v. West of England Ship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n (Luxembourg)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Rogers v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Ernst & Young, LLP v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Aurora Healthcare, Inc. v. Ramsey, 1091561 (Ala. 10-21-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  4. Paw Paw's Camper City, Inc. v. HaymanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Climastor IV, L.L.C. v. Marshall Construction, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API