Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Chamblee
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 8, 2004No. 1030481PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In this case we consider the petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Troy Chamblee and Tony Jackson, and their subsequently filed "supplemental" petition for a writ of mandamus. The petitions respectively implicate the authority of the trial judge under Rule 59.1, Ala. R. Civ. P., and Rule 60, Ala. R. Civ. P. We grant both petitions.
The underlying procedural history, which is controlling, is as follows:
Chamblee and Jackson separately sued Pinkerton Security Investigations Services, Inc. ("Pinkerton"), and Albert Bell. The cases were consolidated for trial before Tennant M. Smallwood, Jr.,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex Parte Johnson Land Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Ex Parte DavidsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Carnes v. CarnesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Ex Parte Caterpillar, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Farmer v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Sealy, L.L.C. v. BanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- PINKERTON SEC. AND INVES. SERV., INC. v. ChambleeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Woods v. Suntrust Bank, 2090627 (ala.civ.app. 9-16-2011)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- PINKERTON SEC. & INVESTIGATIONS v. ChambleeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Arrington v. Courtyard Citiflats, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.