Farrell v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Williams, J. †
Respondents Farrell, Suther and Clark are the owners of property located in the Fremont district' of Seattle. The additional respondent, Site Development, Inc., a Washington corporation, holds options to purchase the properties of the other individual respondents. This action arose out of the refusal of the city of Seattle, the appellant herein, to rezone respondents’ property from a residential to a business use classification.
North 46th Street is an east-west arterial; and Fremont Avenue North is a north-south arterial. The subject property is situated at the southwest…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lillions v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. CainWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Myhre v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Bishop v. Town of HoughtonWashington Supreme Court · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Duckworth v. City of Bonney LakeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Norco Construction, Inc. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Kendall v. Douglas, Grant, Lincoln, & Okanogan Counties Public Hospital District No. 6Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Abbenhaus v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.