Legal Opinion

Conlin v. San Francisco & San Jose Railroad

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1868PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial. District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Crockett, J.:

There is but one question presented for our consideration on this appeal, to wit: whether or not the Court erred in refusing three instructions to the jury requested by the defendant. The plaintiff insists that the instructions were properly refused, if for no other reason, because they were not pertinent to any issue raised by the pleadings. It becomes necessary, therefore, to ascertain with precision what the issues were.

*407The complaint avers that the defendant is a corporation, and is the owner of a railroad, with the cars, engines, and other appurtenances…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Charleston & Savannah Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  2. Parliman v. YoungSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1879
  3. Peters v. McKay & Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Duff v. Willamette Steel WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Gibson v. Sterling Furniture Co.California Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API