Legal Opinion

Contant v. Wallace

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1923No. Civ. No. 3674PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

This cause was tried, the appeal was perfected, and the briefs on appeal were filed in the lifetime of Jacob Sholley, the original defendant. The suggestion of his death and the substitution of his executor in his stead were made in this court.

Plaintiff, a real estate broker, brought the action for the purpose of recovering a broker’s commission. The complaint alleges that Sholley employed her as his agent to sell a certain parcel of real property, that she found a purchaser and that Sholley “accepted the proposal of the purchaser so secured . . . and entered into a written agreement of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Twogood v. MonnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Johnson v. KrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Cone v. KeilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Massie v. ChatomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bail v. GlantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Grove v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Brooks v. GrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Henry v. NelmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Ford v. CottonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API