Legal Opinion

Ford v. Cotton

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1927No. Docket No. 4525PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, J.,

pro tem. — This is an action, tried without a jury, to recover brokerage claimed by plaintiff under a contract with defendant' reading as follows:

“Los Angeles, California,
“April Third, 1922.
“Mr. L. M. Ford, 1023 Chapman Bldg., Los Angeles, Calif.
“Dear Sir: In the event of your being able to negotiate a sale of 73 acres of land, more or less, belonging to H. H. Cotton, et al., located:
“Immediately north of Wilshire boulevard beginning at a point on Wilshire boulevard and Preuss road, running in an easterly direction to a point on Wilshire boulevard to the beginning of the property…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Twogood v. MonnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Bail v. GlantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Tower v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Umphray v. HufschmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Woodbridge Realty v. Plymouth Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API