People v. Gonzalez
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge Breitel.
The exclusive issue is whether in a criminal action defendants’ written consents to search their apartment were involuntary as a matter of law, as indeed the Appellate Division concluded.
Defendants, after denial of their motions to suppress drugs uncovered and seized under the consents, were convicted upon their pleas of guilty of possession of drugs (Penal Law, § 220.16). The Appellate Division unanimously reversed their convictions, on the law, vacated their pleas, granted defendants’ motions to suppress the drugs seized, and remanded to Supreme Court for further…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by398 opinions
- People v. HollmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. DodtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. GlassNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. BanksNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
393 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.