Legal Opinion

People v. Glass

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1977PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Fuchsberg, J.

The defendant was convicted of burglary and grand larceny after a jury trial. Subsequent to the filing of a notice of appeal, it was discovered that the stenographer who recorded the proceedings could not find the untranscribed stenographic notes covering the summations and the Judge’s charge to the jury. They have never been found. Defendant’s primary contention on this appeal is that he was thus effectively deprived of his "fundamental right” to appellate review (People v Montgomery, 24 NY2d 130, 132) and therefore is entitled to summary reversal and a new…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. Bedros Yavru-SakukNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. State v. VitaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. People v. ParrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2004

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API