Legal Opinion

People v. Knapp

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1981PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Fuchsberg, J.

Defendant Warren Knapp was convicted, following a jury trial, of criminal possession and of criminal sale of a controlled substance, each in the sixth degree (Penal Law, §§ 220.06, 220.31). The Appellate Division having affirmed, the appeal is here by permission of a Judge of this court (CPL 460.20).

In the main, we are called upon to decide whether the *692warrantless search of defendant’s home, conducted at the time of his arrest, was reasonable within the meaning of our Constitutions (NY Const, art I, § 12; US Const, 4th, 14th Arndts). For the reasons which…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. People v. DodtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. CarrasquilloNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. ArnauNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. StithNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API