Digital & Analog Design Corp. v. North Supply Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
Appellant’s propositions of law raise essentially two issues for our review: (1) whether, and under what situations, it is proper to award prejudgment interest, pursuant to R.C. 1343.03(C), if the plaintiff has been awarded punitive damages; and (2) whether a litigant in a tort action is entitled to have a jury determine whether, or in what amount, attorney fees should be awarded. We address each of these issues in turn.
I
R.C. 1343.03(C) reads as follows:
“Interest on a judgment, decree, or order for the payment of money rendered in a civil action based on tortious conduct and not settled by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. BombolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Columbus Finance, Inc. v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Villella v. Waikem Motors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Zoppo v. Homestead InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Galmish v. CicchiniOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Smith v. PrintupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Akron-Canton Waste Oil, Inc. v. Safety-Kleen Oil Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Coates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.