Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 9, 1930No. 27,720PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 230 N.W. 793, 231 N.W. 920. Plaintiff purchased a ticket for passage on one of defendant's freight trains from Vernon Center to Blue Earth in this state. The train was what is known as an accommodation or mixed train — a freight train carrying passengers in the caboose between local points. Plaintiff was a former employe of the defendant, an experienced railway brakeman and conductor. He was familiar with the operation of this train over the route he intended to travel. He well knew that under the rules of the company and under the state law the conductor had no right to permit…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Gulf, Mobile & Northern Railroad v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Depue v. FlatauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. Mitton v. Cargill Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Minneapolis Mill Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  5. Corrigan v. ElsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roadman v. C. E. Johnson Motor SalesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  2. Guild v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Anderson v. Hawthorn Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Donnelly v. StepkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API