Minneapolis Mill Co. v. Wheeler
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeals by defendants from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, refusing a new trial after a trial before Lochren, J"., and a jury. cited, among other cases, Nash v. Minneapolis Mill Co., 24 Minn. 501.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
The plaintiff had constructed and was operating a canal for the use of its water-power through its land on the west bank of the Mississippi river, in the city of Minneapolis, extending for a considerable distance below its dam in the river. The defendants were the owners of a mill and site upon the canal, under a grant derived from the plaintiff, which included “a right of way across the canal in front of and adjacent to said premises, and to erect and maintain a bridge across said canal. ” Over the canal, in front of the mill, the grantors of defendants had erected a bridge or platform for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Carleton v. Franconia Iron & Steel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Inhabitants of Westfield v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Churchill v. HoltMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Nash v. Minneapolis Mill Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
3Cited by40 opinions
- Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Lamb v. Belt Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Butler Bros. v. American Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.