Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Mill Co. v. Wheeler

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 25, 1883PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Appeals by defendants from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, refusing a new trial after a trial before Lochren, J"., and a jury. cited, among other cases, Nash v. Minneapolis Mill Co., 24 Minn. 501.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

The plaintiff had constructed and was operating a canal for the use of its water-power through its land on the west bank of the Mississippi river, in the city of Minneapolis, extending for a considerable distance below its dam in the river. The defendants were the owners of a mill and site upon the canal, under a grant derived from the plaintiff, which included “a right of way across the canal in front of and adjacent to said premises, and to erect and maintain a bridge across said canal. ” Over the canal, in front of the mill, the grantors of defendants had erected a bridge or platform for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Carleton v. Franconia Iron & Steel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Inhabitants of Westfield v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. Churchill v. HoltMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  5. Nash v. Minneapolis Mill Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1878

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Lamb v. Belt Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Butler Bros. v. American Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API