Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Nissen

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 31, 1992No. 91CA0088PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge NEY.

In this matter of first impression, petitioner, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., appeals from the judgment in which the trial court held that the uninsured motorist insurance contained in the policy State Farm issued to respondent, Louise Nissen, provided coverage to her for injuries she received in attempting to stop the theft of her car. We affirm.

The parties have stipulated to the facts. Nissen attempted to stop the theft of her car by leaning across her car’s windshield. The thief, with Nissen on the hood of her car, struck another vehicle in a head-on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Terranova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Kral v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. American Protection Insurance v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. Allstate Insurance Co. v. FeghaliSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. NissenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Briggs v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Brekke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Claire v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Mavashev v. Windsor Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API