Mavashev v. Windsor Insurance Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge STERNBERG. *
The determinative issue in this appeal is whether an uninsured motorist (UM) insurance contract that contains a corroboration clause is void as a violation of public policy.
The clause provides that, in a hit-and-run accident where the vehicles do not make contact, the policy will provide coverage only if the fact of the accident is corroborated by evidence other than the testimony of a person making a claim under the policy. We find this provision to be contrary to public policy and therefore reverse the judgment that reached a contrary conclusion.
On the night of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Terranova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. NissenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Huizar v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Peterman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boulter v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2018
- Alabassi v. T.I.B. Insurance BrokersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Uhl v. Progressive Direct Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025