Legal Opinion

Maguire v. Merrimack Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 13, 1990No. 89-262PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court (Groff, J.) denying the defendant’s motion for'attorney’s fees. The issue presented is whether the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion where the jury determined by a preponderance of the evidence, using a special verdict form, that the plaintiffs set fire to their own home in order to obtain insurance proceeds. We affirm.

In 1982 the plaintiffs commenced an action against the defendant for fire insurance benefits under a homeowner’s insurance policy. The defendant refused to pay on the ground that the plaintiffs, or someone…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. Keenan v. FearonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  3. Jaswell Drill Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  4. Pugliese v. Town of Northwood Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  5. St. Germain v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. SmartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. Clipper Affiliates, Inc. v. ChecovichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  3. Flanagan v. PrudhommeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  4. Rix v. Kinderworks Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  5. Adams v. BradshawSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API