Legal Opinion

Manchester Housing Authority v. Zyla

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 25, 1978No. 7940PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

The question in this case is whether the trial court erroneously refused to compel enforcement of an out-of-court settlement reached by the attorneys for their respective parties. We hold the trial court’s refusal was erroneous.

This case arises out of an eminent domain action for the taking of land and buildings in the Civic Center Project in Manchester. Defendant obtained counsel to represent him in his claim for damages above the tender that had been paid by the Manchester Housing Authority when the properties were originally taken. Following the suspension of defendant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beliveau v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
  2. Burtman v. ButmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  3. Town of Alton v. Town of GilmantonSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1823
  4. Ducey v. CoreySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Navajo Tribe of Indians v. Hanosh Chevrolet-Buick, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Byblos Corp. v. Salem Farm Realty TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  3. Cook v. Surety Life Insurance Co.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Bower v. Davis & Symonds Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  5. Halstead v. MurraySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API