Legal Opinion

Tetzlaff v. Camp

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 2, 2006No. 04-1499PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STREIT, Justice.

With ownership of property comes responsibility. The plaintiffs, Wayne, Barbara, and Briana Tetzlaff (Tetzlaffs), rural homeowners, appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of co-defendants Al and Rachael Pangborn (Pang-borns), owners of adjacent property, on their nuisance claim. Tetzlaffs contend the district court erred in ruling as a matter of law that Pangborns could not be found liable for the other co-defendants’, Tim and Glenna Camp (Camps), decision to spread manure on the Pangborn property. Because we find a landlord may be liable if he or she renews a lease…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Meier v. SENECAUT IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. MilneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. Boyle v. Alum-Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  4. Patz v. Farmegg Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  5. Van Essen v. Farmers Cooperative ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bank of America, N.A. v. SchulteSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. Ames Rental Property Ass'n v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  3. Toby Thornton v. American Interstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  4. Curt Daniels Vs. John Holtz Wsh Properties Llc Navajo Associates, Llc, John Does And Jane Roes 1–5Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  5. Ballalatak v. All Iowa Agriculture Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API