Legal Opinion
Matter of Kiriloff v. A.G.W. Wet Wash Laundry
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 19, 1944PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
We are to determine whether, in the circumstances disclosed by this record, an award to the claimant-respondent may be made against the Fund for Beopened Cases created by section 25-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.
The relief which the claimant seeks has been denied by a decision of the State Industrial Board, which was reversed at the Appellate Division (257 App. Div. 37, 266 App. Div. 931; and see 282 N. Y. 466). The case comes to us upon appeals by the Industrial Board and the Fund for Reopened Cases.
The record discloses that in an industrial accident suffered by the claimant on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ryan v. American Bridge Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Matter of Ryan v. American Bridge CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Claim of Kiriloff v. A. G. W. Wet Wash Laundry, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Claim of Kiriloff v. A. G. W. Wet Wash Laundry, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
3Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of Casey v. Hinkle Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Riley v. Aircraft Products Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Claim of Pascucci v. William Kennedy Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Claim of Esterow v. Schimel, Son & LustigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Claim of Watkins v. Cornwall Press, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.