Legal Opinion
Claim of Esterow v. Schimel, Son & Lustig
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 10, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The Fund for Reopened Cases under section 25-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law has appealed from a decision and an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board allowing claimant compensation for permanent total disability covering a period of. two years immediately preceding his application to reopen his claim in an amount totaling $3,138.88 with payments to continue.
*327The appellant and claimant stipulated the following facts:
“ 1. That the claimant herein, Jacob Esterow, sustained an injury to the sole of his right foot when he stepped on a nail on the 10th of March 1932. That as a result of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Kiriloff v. A.G.W. Wet Wash LaundryNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Claim of Kiriloff v. A. G. W. Wet Wash Laundry, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Claim of Kiriloff v. A. G. W. Wet Wash Laundry, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
3Cited by1 opinion
- Claim of Likepities v. Donner Steel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951