Legal Opinion
Claim of Kiriloff v. A. G. W. Wet Wash Laundry, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 10, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
Claimant has appealed from a decision of the State Industrial Board, dated January 4, 1938, denying his application to have his case against respondents closed, in order that it might later be reopened and an award made in his favor against the Special Fund for Reopened Cases in accordance with the provisions' of section 25-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.
On December 12,1923, while claimant was engaged in the regular course of his employment in the service of his employer, he sustained serious injuries, as a result of which he is today permanently partially disabled.
Various awards were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ryan v. American Bridge Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Claim of Tipton v. Lang's Bakery, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Matter of Tipton v. Lang's Bakery, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of Kiriloff v. A.G.W. Wet Wash LaundryNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Claim of Esterow v. Schimel, Son & LustigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Claim of Kiriloff v. A. G. W. Wet Wash Laundry, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939