Legal Opinion
United States v. John Andrew Dane
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 1, 1978No. 76-2448PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Dane appeals the revocation of his probation. He argues that because he had no notice of the condition which he was alleged to have violated and because the acts leading to revocation were committed outside of the United States and violated no United States law, the district judge abused his discretion in revoking probation. We affirm.
*842I
On June 30, 1975, Dane pleaded guilty to a charge of possessing Claymore mines in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5861(d), 5871. On August 25, 1975, Dane was sentenced to five years in prison, six months to be served in a jail-type institution…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- United States v. Rickey Dean SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. GalloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- United States v. Richard A. TonryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Nicole Figg v. Duane Russell Mary Lou Jorgensen Robert Hofer Brent Walker Brenda Hyde J. Does, 1-10Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.