Legal Opinion

In Re Spell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 29, 2003No. 25726PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent and Disciplinary Counsel have entered into an agreement pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, in which respondent admits misconduct and agrees to accept an admonition or a public reprimand. We accept the agreement and issue a public reprimand. The facts, as set forth in the agreement, are as follows.

Facts

I. Loan Closing Matter

Respondent was retained by a client to act as a closing attorney in the refinancing of the client’s home. When respondent learned the client would not be available on the date originally scheduled for the closing, he provided the loan package to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re LesterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re DaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  2. In the Matter of Jeffrey T. SpellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API