Legal Opinion

Gourley v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 10, 1925No. Nos. 15748, 15749, ConsolidatedPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, .C.

The plaintiffs brought their separate actions against the defendant, Austin B. Gourley, and judgment being rendered in favor of each of the plaintiffs, the defendant appeals, and the cases were consolidated by order of this court. The petitions are for all practical purposes identical, and the evidence varies but slightly, and the cases can be considered together.

In, ease No. 15749, the petition alleges plaintiff was driving a Ford touring car-east -on East 23rd street, approximately ten miles east of Oklahoma City, and defendant was driving a “Tulsa” touring ear west on…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Meeks v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Good v. First Nat. Bank of RoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Everett v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Higgins, Admr. v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  2. Mullins v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Union Transportation Co. v. LambSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ada v. ElamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. City of Edmond v. WashamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API