State v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUCE C. STONE, Judge. *
This is an appeal of a sentence following a conviction for fifth-degree possession of a controlled substance committed with the use or possession of a firearm. Appellant contends that because he used a firearm in self-defense or in defense of another and because such use or possession was unrelated to his controlled substance offense, the trial court should not have imposed a mandatory minimum sentence under Minn.Stat. § 609.11, subd. 5. We affirm the sentence.
FACTS
On March 2, 1995, at approximately 11:15 p.m., police officers from both Minneapolis and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. FlorineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. MollbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. MontjoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. CusickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HerbertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. RoysterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- In the Matter of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Special Permit No. 16868 (December 21, 2012) issued to Lynn RogersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. RoysterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998