State v. Royster
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, * Judge. .
Appellant was convicted of selling and possessing narcotics and challenges the district court’s use of the sentencing enhancement provision for possessing a firearm during the commission of a felony controlled-substance crime. We affirm.
FACTS
Police searched appellant Stanley Roy-ster’s home pursuant to a search warrant after making a controlled narcotics buy at his home. Upon entering the home, police ordered Royster and another man to the ground, then handcuffed and searched them. Police found pre-recorded buy money on Royster. While searching Royster’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. FlorineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Geldert v. American National BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.