Legal Opinion

State v. Royster

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 17, 1998No. C5-97-911Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY, * Judge. .

Appellant was convicted of selling and possessing narcotics and challenges the district court’s use of the sentencing enhancement provision for possessing a firearm during the commission of a felony controlled-substance crime. We affirm.

FACTS

Police searched appellant Stanley Roy-ster’s home pursuant to a search warrant after making a controlled narcotics buy at his home. Upon entering the home, police ordered Royster and another man to the ground, then handcuffed and searched them. Police found pre-recorded buy money on Royster. While searching Royster’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. State v. FlorineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Geldert v. American National BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API