Legal Opinion

State v. Royster

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 4, 1999No. C5-97-911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRINGER, J.

We granted review to consider whether appellant Stanley N. Royster was properly sentenced under the mandatory minimum sentence of three years imprisonment under Minn.Stat. § 609.11, subds. 5, 9 (1998), when he was in possession of a firearm while committing a predicate felony offense. Royster was not actually carrying the firearm when he was arrested for the felony but the firearm was nearby. The trial court held that constructive possession of a firearm is an appropriate component of Minn.Stat. § 609.11, subd. 5 and that Royster had possession because the firearm was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dairyland Insurance Co. v. StarkeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BarkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. State v. HerbertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  4. Salcido-Perez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API