Martin & White v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of city of Roanoke. »
1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.
The accused were jointly indicted, tried, convicted and sentenced for violation of the prohibition law (Acts 1916, p. 215). The indictment was comprehensive, as is author*717ized under the Virginia statute, and charged them with the possession and transportation of intoxicating liquor in violation of the State law.
[1] There is no conflict in the testimony, and the facts shown are that the accused were both employes on a dining car, part of an interstate train, running from New York City to Memphis, Tennessee; that while this train stopped for a few minutes in the city of Roanoke, Virginia, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Clark Distilling Co. v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Rhodes v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- United States v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dickerson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
- Williams v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Darling v. Franklin Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Surles v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- Whitaker v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938