Legal Opinion

Darling v. Franklin Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 12, 1927No. 27,074PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Jo|Hnston, C. J.:

This was an action by A. I. Darling to recover from the Franklin Fire Insurance Company, upon a policy of insurance on a garage to an amount not exceeding $5,000. The loss insured against was that occurring directly by tornado, windstorm or cyclone. There was a stipulation in the policy that the company *621should not be liable for any loss or damage caused by hail, whether driven by wind or not, nor snowstorms. It appears that a heavy snowstorm visited Mankato, where the building was located, on March 16, 1924, and was accompanied by a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. PeaveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. Washington-Virginia Railway Co. v. DeahlSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  3. Duncan v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Teter v. SpoonerIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Murray v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. TiedemannMontana Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Beam v. Farmers Union Mutual Hail InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Vogel v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API