Darling v. Franklin Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Jo|Hnston, C. J.:
This was an action by A. I. Darling to recover from the Franklin Fire Insurance Company, upon a policy of insurance on a garage to an amount not exceeding $5,000. The loss insured against was that occurring directly by tornado, windstorm or cyclone. There was a stipulation in the policy that the company *621should not be liable for any loss or damage caused by hail, whether driven by wind or not, nor snowstorms. It appears that a heavy snowstorm visited Mankato, where the building was located, on March 16, 1924, and was accompanied by a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. PeaveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Washington-Virginia Railway Co. v. DeahlSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Duncan v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Teter v. SpoonerIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Murray v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. TiedemannMontana Supreme Court · 1961
- Beam v. Farmers Union Mutual Hail InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Vogel v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950