Legal Opinion

Williams v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 23, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

Hubert Parker and Eddie Williams were charged with violating Code, section 4675 (49a), and convicted by the court without a jury. Their fines were fixed at $250. Since the trial Hubert Parker has died leaving Eddie Williams as the sole plaintiff in error.

There is no dispute about the facts. On April 8, 1936, the two defendants were arrested in their car as they approached the corporate limits of the city of Bristol, Virginia. They were directed to the police station in Bristol, *859Virginia, where the car was searched and 840 pints of whiskey were found. It was seized and held as contraband…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Clark Distilling Co. v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Reading Railroad Company v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal. v. Young's Market Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Rhodes v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
  2. Surles v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  3. Whitaker v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  4. Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  5. Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API